The RF Scale
Survey and associated text ©2006
Bob Altemeyer.
Web adaptation by Chris W. Johnson.
Revised 2023-04‐01.
You will probably find that you agree with some of the following statements, and disagree with others, to varying extents. Please indicate your reaction to each statement according to the following scale:
-4 | if you very strongly disagree with the statement. |
---|---|
-3 | if you strongly disagree with the statement. |
-2 | if you moderately disagree with the statement. |
-1 | if you slightly disagree with the statement. |
0 | if you feel exactly and precisely neutral about the statement. |
+1 | if you slightly agree with the statement. |
+2 | if you moderately agree with the statement. |
+3 | if you strongly agree with the statement. |
+4 | if you very strongly agree with the statement. |
Important: You may find that you sometimes have different reactions to different parts of a statement. For example, you might very strongly disagree (“-4”) with one idea in a statement, but slightly agree (“+1”) with another idea in the same item. When this happens, please combine your reactions, and [record] how you feel on balance (a “-3” in this case).
Your RF scale score is .
Scores range from 12 to 108, so is in the percentile, or at of the range.
Dr. Bob Explains
Unless I have the all‐time worst score on the SAT‐Math test, you can’t score lower than 12, or higher than 108, no matter how you try. Intro psychology students at my Canadian university average about 50, while their parents usually land a few points higher. A nationwide sample of some 300 members of an unnamed fundamentalist Protestant church in the United States, gathered by Ted Witzig, thumped out a 93.1—the highest group score I have yet seen.
Your famous intuition probably led you to suspect this scale has something to do with religious conservatism […]. So you were wised up and should not view your score with much faith (or hope, or charity).
Bruce Hunsberger and I called this the Religious Fundamentalism scale when we developed it some years ago. We did not mean by “fundamentalism” a particular set of religious beliefs, a creed. It was clear that the mind‐set of fundamentalism could be found in many faiths. Instead we tried to measure a person’s attitudes toward whatever beliefs she had, trying to identify the common underlying psychological elements in the thinking of people who were commonly called Christian fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Jewish fundamentalists, and Muslim fundamentalists.
We thought a fundamentalist in any of these major faiths would feel that her religious beliefs contained the fundamental, basic, intrinsic, inerrant truth about humanity and the Divine—fundamentally speaking. She would also believe this essential truth is fundamentally opposed by forces of evil that must be vigorously fought, and that this truth must be followed today according to the fundamental, unchangeable practices of the past. Finally, those who follow these fundamental beliefs would have a special relationship with the deity.
Research has confirmed that the Religious Fundamentalism scale has validity in all the religions named. You can find some high scorers in all of them who fit the description just given. More to the point, the scale may give us a way to study the psychology of the “Religious Right” in America today.
RF scale and associated text ©2006 Bob Altemeyer. This web page was adapted from Dr. Altemeyer’s book The Authoritarians, chapter 4, pp. 106–107. Any mistakes are the adapter’s (Chris’s), not the good doctor’s. The survey’s text is untouched here, but some surrounding text received minor changes. For instance, RF score calculation instructions are omitted, because this page computes the score. Footnotes are left out too. See the book for those and other details. Conversely, the reaction rating key and instructions from the RWA scale are added; the book can assume the reader already knows them, but this page cannot.